How to Interpret Changes in an Athletic Performance Test
Sportscience 8, 1-7, 2004
Updated Sept 2011: the smallest worthwhile change is now stated as 0.3 of the variation in an athlete's performance, not 0.5 as previously.
The basis for this article is an updated version of a slideshow accompanying a talk entitled "making sense of performance tests", which I presented earlier this year at the Scottish Institute of Sport and more recently at a local conference. The talk was based mainly on previous research by my colleagues and me, along with some new and previously unpublished insights. The title now better reflects the emphasis on monitoring an athlete's performance from test to test.
Monitoring the progression of athletes with regular performance and other fitness-related tests is a widespread and apparently useful practice in upper competitive levels of most if not all sports in wealthy countries, but in my experience lack of understanding about the interpretation of changes in test scores is also widespread. Perhaps the most important issue is that of magnitude: to interpret the change in an athlete's performance since a previous test, you need some concept of the magnitude of change that matters to the athlete in his or her sport. The first section of the talk is therefore concerned with identifying the smallest worthwhile change in performance. Your ability to track such changes with a performance test depends on the validity and reliability of the test, which I explain in the second section. The final section is devoted to several ways of interpreting the test results for the athlete or coach. See also commentaries by Christopher Gore and David Pyne, to whom I am indebted for valuable interactions and feedback on this topic.
Published Nov 2004