|
SPORTSCIENCE |
sportsci.org |
|
News & Comment: Biomechanics |
|
JUDGING GYMNASTICS WITH BIOMECHANICS |
|
Wm A Sandsa PhD, Jeni R McNeal MS CSCS |
|
Department of Exercise & Sport Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112. aCorresponding author: wmasands=AT=concentric.net |
|
Sportscience 3(1), sportsci.org/jour/9901/was.html, 1999 (865 words) |
|
Reviewed by Todd L Allinger, Resource Center for Sport Science, Medicine & Education, The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 |
|
Human judges often have difficulty in determining the subtle differences in trajectories and speed between competitors in gymnastics. We have devised an objective scoring system for the compulsory vault by using video digitizing, infrared timers, and a computer algorithm. We combined the objective score with a human judge's score for form errors. The objective score successfully increased the differentiation between performances in a trial of 25 gymnasts at a competition. Reprint · Help |
|
KEYWORDS: competitive performance, judge, score, skill, vault |
In sports like gymnastics, judging competitors is notoriously political and subjective. Modern biomechanics may provide an objective way to score the movement of athletes in these sports. Recently we undertook a feasibility study of such a scoring system for USA Gymnastics.
We used video digitizing, infrared timers, and a computer algorithm to "judge" compulsory vaulting of 25 gymnasts at the 1999 American Classic Competition in Pomona, California. The International Gymnastics Federation has dropped compulsory routines, but USA Gymnastics wants to maintain the educational aspects of compulsory exercises by designing national compulsories that emphasize crucial aspects of performance.
We compiled the score from a custom program for evaluation of the run-up and a commercially available program that permitted hand digitizing of a gymnast's image. A single human judge observed the performance for form errors and applied a deduction to the score provided by computer analysis.
Coaches and officials were very pleased with the outcome of the first trial. The time required to perform the measurements was approximately 90 seconds per vault, which compares well with the time required for human judges to perform the same functions. The coaches, judges, and officials found that the scores conformed well with the scores expected for the individual vault. The second trial of the system will occur this July at the US Classic Competition in Rochester, New York.
Technical Information
The timing system (Brower Timing Systems, Draper, Utah) consisted of six infrared sensors on tripods placed in pairs along the vault runway. The telemetered timing system was interfaced to a laptop computer via custom software to provide millisecond resolution of run-up time intervals. The infrared sensors were set at 1.52-meter intervals beginning at 10.7 meters. The six sensor pairs provided five intervals from which the computer software determined if the athlete maintained acceleration from interval to interval. Points were awarded for a continuing acceleration throughout the latter part of the run-up.
We assessed the kinematics of the vault with proprietary software (NEAT Systems, Annapolis, Maryland). The software enables recording and displaying of video sequences. Distances are calibrated prior to sequence analysis. The software also permits the repeated digitization of a single point with a running displacement and speed value displayed for each digitized point.
We recorded each athletes performance with a computer frame grabber and stored it on the computers hard disk. We then displayed the video sequence and selected the field showing the moment of departure from the horse. We recorded the height of the hip joint, then digitized the hip-joint center frame-by-frame to depict the path of the trajectory of the gymnast. We assumed the hip joint represented the gymnast's center of mass. We also recorded the peak height of the flight trajectory and the distance of the peak from the horse.
|
Figure 1: Screen image of the analysis for a gymnast performing a Yurchenko vault. |
|
|
|
Lines indicate digitized distances. Circles show the digitized path of the gymnast's hip in consecutive frames. |
Figure 1 shows the gymnast in the latter phase of post-flight. The
vertical line from the horse indicates the height of the gymnast from
hand to hip. The long horizontal line indicates the height of the hip
at horse departure. The circles show the digitized path of the
gymnast's hip in each frame of the post-flight. The height of the
trajectory is the maximum distance above the horizontal line at horse
departure. The line slightly below the digitized circles shows the
distance of the post-flight. We used the lengths of these lines to
calculate the gymnasts score. We calculated relative
displacements by dividing post-flight height and post-flight
horizontal distance by the height of the gymnast from hands to hip. A
computer algorithm then calculated weighted scores based on the
height and distance of the flight, and whether the gymnast
accelerated through all parts of the run-up.
editor=AT=sportsci.org
· webmaster=AT=sportsci.org
· Homepage
· ©1999
Edited and webmastered by Will Hopkins.
Published March 1999.